Skip to content
nicebread.de

nicebread.de

Prof. Dr. Felix Schönbrodt

Primary menu

  • Blog
  • Open Research
    • Bayesian Statistics
    • Das Zürcher Modell sozialer Motivation (German)
  • Publications
  • Presentations/Workshops
  • CV
  • ➙ shinyapps.org
  • ➙ researchtransparency.org

Author: nicebread

By nicebread / Posted on2016-12-19

Honoured to receive the Leamer-Rosenthal-Prize

I’m honoured that the Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences (BITSS) chose me for one of the 2016 Leamer-Rosenthal Prizes for Open Social Science! This award comes with a prize of $10,000 and “recognizes important contributions by individuals in the Continue Reading …

By nicebread / Posted on2016-09-09

Open Science and research quality at the German conference on psychology (DGPs congress in Leipzig)

From 17th to 22th September, the 50th anniversary congress of the German psychological association takes place in Leipzig. On previous conferences in Germany in the last two or three years, the topic of the credibility crisis and research transparency has Continue Reading …

By nicebread / Posted on2016-06-21

Introducing the p-hacker app: Train your expert p-hacking skills

[This is a guest post by Ned Bicare, PhD] My dear fellow scientists! “If you torture the data long enough, it will confess.” This aphorism, attributed to Ronald Coase, sometimes has been used in a disrespective manner, as if it was wrong Continue Reading …

By nicebread / Posted on2016-04-15

Optional stopping does not bias parameter estimates (if done correctly)

tl;dr: Optional stopping does not bias parameter estimates from a frequentist point of view if all studies are reported (i.e., no publication bias exists) and effect sizes are appropriately meta-analytically weighted. Several recent discussions on the Psychological Methods Facebook group Continue Reading …

By nicebread / Posted on2016-02-16

LMU psychology department distributes funding based on criteria of research transparency

The Psychology Department at LMU Munich continues to change the incentive structure towards reproducible and open science. The internal distribution of funding now partly is based on transparency criteria: Publications with open data, open material and pre-registrations get bonus points Continue Reading …

By nicebread / Posted on2016-01-06

Changing hiring practices towards research transparency: The first open science statement in a professorship advertisement

Engaging in open science practices increases knowledge as a common good, and ensures the reproducibility, verifiability and credibility of research. But some have the fear that on an individual strategic level (in particular from an early career perspective) engaging in Continue Reading …

By nicebread / Posted on2015-12-15

Putting the ‘I’ in open science: How you can change the face of science

If we want to shift from a closed science to an open science, there has to be change at several levels. In this process, it’s easy to push the responsibility (and the power) for reform onto “the system”: “If only Continue Reading …

By nicebread / Posted on2015-11-03

What’s the probability that a significant p-value indicates a true effect?

If the p-value is < .05, then the probability of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis is  <5%, right? That means, a maximum of 5% of all significant results is a false-positive (that’s what we control with the α rate). Well, Continue Reading …

By nicebread / Posted on2015-09-29

Reflections about our first Open-Science-Committee’s meeting

Yesterday, we had the first meeting of our department’s Open Science Committee. I am happy that the committee has 20 members, representing every research unit of the department, and all groups from PhD students to full professors. In the meeting, Continue Reading …

By nicebread / Posted on2015-09-08

A voluntary commitment to research transparency

The Reproducibility Project: Psychology was published last week, and it was another blow to the overall credibility of the current research system’s output. Some interpretations of the results were in a “Hey, it’s all fine; nothing to see here; let’s Continue Reading …

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →
ORCID iD iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-3910

Tweets by Felix

  • nicebread303 @dingding_peng +1! And, the decision about access should be made by the third-party repository, based on predefine… t.co/3BCr3VoAZH Time ago 2 Days via Twitter Web App Reply - Retweet - Favorite
  • RT @maltoesermalte: New paper from the lab, together with @darahallinan and Franziska Boehm from @FIZKarlsruhe! We provide general practica… Time ago 4 Days via Twitter Web App Reply - Retweet - Favorite
  • We are so happy to have @MalikaIhle in Munich as the first scientific coordinator of our @lmu_osc Open Science Cent… t.co/zKhPTqK0eq Time ago 4 Days via Twitter Web App Reply - Retweet - Favorite
  • RT @PCI_RegReports: We're delighted to welcome our first @PsychScience journal, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science,… Time ago 4 Days via Twitter for iPhone Reply - Retweet - Favorite

Follow @nicebread303 on twitter.

Footer menu

  • Blog
  • Open Research
  • Publications
  • Presentations/Workshops
  • CV
  • Datenschutz
Copyright © 2022 nicebread.de. All Rights Reserved. Datenschutz
Theme: Higher Education
Scroll Up Top